Hungary vs Uzbekistan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Hungary
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 3,350 t against 1,664 t in Hungary, a difference of 1,686 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.0 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Hungary ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,437 t | 63,564 t | 59,127 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 5,157 t | 19,000 t | 13,842 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 6,206 t | 1,675 t | 4,531 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Hungary or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 3,350 t against 1,664 t in Hungary as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Hungary and Uzbekistan?
- 1,686 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Uzbekistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Hungary and Uzbekistan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Hungary ranks 38th and Uzbekistan ranks 36th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf