Lithuania vs Mexico: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 172,058 t against 118,567 t in Lithuania, a difference of 53,491 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Lithuania ranks 7th and Mexico ranks 5th of 86 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,941 t | 22,891 t | 13,951 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 14,798 t | 160,602 t | 145,804 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 66,055 t | 121,932 t | 55,878 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Lithuania or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 172,058 t against 118,567 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Lithuania and Mexico?
- 53,491 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mexico?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Mexico rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 7th and Mexico ranks 5th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf