Austria vs Chile: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Austria
- Chile
How they compare
Austria currently reports 126.75 1000 USD against 118.98 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 7.77 1000 USD.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Austria ranks 64th and Chile ranks 65th of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 366.18 1000 USD | 65.18 1000 USD | 301 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2010s | 554.96 1000 USD | 2.92 1000 USD | 552.04 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2020s | 46.84 1000 USD | 191.34 1000 USD | 144.49 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Austria or Chile?
- Austria, at 126.75 1000 USD against 118.98 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Austria and Chile?
- 7.77 1000 USD, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Chile?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Chile rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Austria ranks 64th and Chile ranks 65th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf