Austria vs Kyrgyzstan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Austria
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 126.75 1000 USD against 104.79 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 21.96 1000 USD.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 64th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 66th of 86 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,185 1000 USD | 570.94 1000 USD | 614.3 1000 USD | Austria |
| 2020s | 21.59 1000 USD | 273.01 1000 USD | 251.42 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Austria or Kyrgyzstan?
- Austria, at 126.75 1000 USD against 104.79 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Austria and Kyrgyzstan?
- 21.96 1000 USD, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Austria ranks 64th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 66th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf