Belgium vs Jordan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Belgium
- Jordan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 65,211 1000 USD against 33,860 1000 USD in Jordan, a difference of 31,351 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.9 times Jordan's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 9th and Jordan ranks 11th of 86 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69,732 1000 USD | 969.39 1000 USD | 68,763 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 52,119 1000 USD | 5,867 1000 USD | 46,252 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 63,405 1000 USD | 17,055 1000 USD | 46,350 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Belgium or Jordan?
- Belgium, at 65,211 1000 USD against 33,860 1000 USD in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Belgium and Jordan?
- 31,351 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Jordan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Jordan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Belgium ranks 9th and Jordan ranks 11th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf