Belgium vs Spain: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Export value over time
- Belgium
- Spain
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 65,211 1000 USD against 41,185 1000 USD in Spain, a difference of 24,026 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.6 times Spain's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 9th and Spain ranks 10th of 86 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62,077 1000 USD | 15,971 1000 USD | 46,105 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 52,119 1000 USD | 4,969 1000 USD | 47,150 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 63,405 1000 USD | 23,236 1000 USD | 40,169 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) β export value, Belgium or Spain?
- Belgium, at 65,211 1000 USD against 41,185 1000 USD in Spain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) β export value between Belgium and Spain?
- 24,026 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Spain?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Spain rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) β export value?
- Belgium ranks 9th and Spain ranks 10th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) β Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf