Canada vs Serbia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Canada
- Serbia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 11,509 1000 USD against 8,903 1000 USD in Serbia, a difference of 2,606 1000 USD.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 26th of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,255 1000 USD | 1,128 1000 USD | 12,127 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2010s | 17,578 1000 USD | 4,587 1000 USD | 12,990 1000 USD | Canada |
| 2020s | 6,755 1000 USD | 9,546 1000 USD | 2,791 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Canada or Serbia?
- Canada, at 11,509 1000 USD against 8,903 1000 USD in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Canada and Serbia?
- 2,606 1000 USD, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Serbia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Canada ranks 23rd and Serbia ranks 26th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf