Chile vs Denmark: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Chile
- Denmark
How they compare
Chile currently reports 118.98 1000 USD against 86.56 1000 USD in Denmark, a difference of 32.42 1000 USD.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 65th and Denmark ranks 67th of 86 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.97 1000 USD | 323.99 1000 USD | 266.02 1000 USD | Denmark |
| 2010s | 2.92 1000 USD | 12.01 1000 USD | 9.08 1000 USD | Denmark |
| 2020s | 191.34 1000 USD | 218.64 1000 USD | 27.3 1000 USD | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Chile or Denmark?
- Chile, at 118.98 1000 USD against 86.56 1000 USD in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Chile and Denmark?
- 32.42 1000 USD, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Denmark?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Denmark rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Chile ranks 65th and Denmark ranks 67th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf