Costa Rica vs Ireland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 177.48 1000 USD against 174.45 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.03 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 60th and Ireland ranks 59th of 86 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 119.49 1000 USD | 13.4 1000 USD | 106.09 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.09 1000 USD | 0 1000 USD | 0.09 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 90.35 1000 USD | 88.75 1000 USD | 1.6 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Costa Rica or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 177.48 1000 USD against 174.45 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 3.03 1000 USD, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Ireland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 60th and Ireland ranks 59th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf