Costa Rica vs Ukraine: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 196.04 1000 USD against 174.45 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 21.59 1000 USD.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ukraine ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 60th and Ukraine ranks 57th of 86 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 122.62 1000 USD | 20,363 1000 USD | 20,240 1000 USD | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 106.31 1000 USD | 5,845 1000 USD | 5,738 1000 USD | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Costa Rica or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 196.04 1000 USD against 174.45 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Costa Rica and Ukraine?
- 21.59 1000 USD, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ukraine?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Ukraine rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 60th and Ukraine ranks 57th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf