Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Czechia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 911.5 1000 USD against 598.24 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 313.26 1000 USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 43rd and Kazakhstan ranks 45th of 86 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 200.02 1000 USD | 311.36 1000 USD | 111.34 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 496.18 1000 USD | 1,385 1000 USD | 888.66 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
- Czechia, at 911.5 1000 USD against 598.24 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 313.26 1000 USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Czechia ranks 43rd and Kazakhstan ranks 45th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf