Denmark vs Kyrgyzstan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Denmark
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 104.79 1000 USD against 86.56 1000 USD in Denmark, a difference of 18.23 1000 USD.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Denmark ranks 67th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 66th of 86 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.34 1000 USD | 570.94 1000 USD | 544.6 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 204.34 1000 USD | 273.01 1000 USD | 68.67 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Denmark or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 104.79 1000 USD against 86.56 1000 USD in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Denmark and Kyrgyzstan?
- 18.23 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Denmark ranks 67th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 66th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf