Ecuador vs Japan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- Japan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 138.89 1000 USD against 131.81 1000 USD in Japan, a difference of 7.08 1000 USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 61st and Japan ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.67 1000 USD | 102.89 1000 USD | 97.22 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 175.96 1000 USD | 109.41 1000 USD | 66.56 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 139.68 1000 USD | 122.16 1000 USD | 17.51 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Ecuador or Japan?
- Ecuador, at 138.89 1000 USD against 131.81 1000 USD in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Ecuador and Japan?
- 7.08 1000 USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Japan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Japan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 61st and Japan ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf