Guatemala vs Ireland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Guatemala
- Ireland
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 183.95 1000 USD against 177.48 1000 USD in Ireland, a difference of 6.47 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 58th and Ireland ranks 59th of 86 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.14 1000 USD | 14.81 1000 USD | 1.33 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 217.23 1000 USD | 0 1000 USD | 217.23 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 698.43 1000 USD | 88.75 1000 USD | 609.68 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Guatemala or Ireland?
- Guatemala, at 183.95 1000 USD against 177.48 1000 USD in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Guatemala and Ireland?
- 6.47 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Ireland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Ireland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Guatemala ranks 58th and Ireland ranks 59th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf