Latvia vs Norway: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Latvia
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 7,639 1000 USD against 5,650 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 1,989 1000 USD.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 82 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.76 1000 USD | 782.9 1000 USD | 706.14 1000 USD | Norway |
| 2010s | 696.33 1000 USD | 9,243 1000 USD | 8,547 1000 USD | Norway |
| 2020s | 2,616 1000 USD | 12,245 1000 USD | 9,629 1000 USD | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Latvia or Norway?
- Norway, at 7,639 1000 USD against 5,650 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Latvia and Norway?
- 1,989 1000 USD, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Latvia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 28th of 82 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf