Latvia vs Serbia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8,903 1000 USD against 5,650 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 3,253 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.6 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 27th of 82 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.16 1000 USD | 70.24 1000 USD | 40.92 1000 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 696.33 1000 USD | 4,789 1000 USD | 4,092 1000 USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,616 1000 USD | 9,546 1000 USD | 6,931 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 8,903 1000 USD against 5,650 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Latvia and Serbia?
- 3,253 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Latvia ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 27th of 82 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf