Sweden vs Zambia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value over time
- Sweden
- Zambia
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 621.61 1000 USD against 571.34 1000 USD in Zambia, a difference of 50.27 1000 USD.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 44th and Zambia ranks 46th of 86 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.44 1000 USD | 29.52 1000 USD | 50.92 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 401.27 1000 USD | 27.62 1000 USD | 373.65 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2020s | 518.05 1000 USD | 192.78 1000 USD | 325.27 1000 USD | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value, Sweden or Zambia?
- Sweden, at 621.61 1000 USD against 571.34 1000 USD in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value between Sweden and Zambia?
- 50.27 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Sweden and Zambia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export value?
- Sweden ranks 44th and Zambia ranks 46th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf