Afghanistan vs Estonia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Afghanistan
2,188 t
in 2022
Estonia
2,220 t
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
77th
Estonia rank
76th
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Afghanistan
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2,220 t against 2,188 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 32 t.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 77th and Estonia ranks 76th of 165 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 227.33 t | 28,425 t | 28,198 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 642.46 t | 37,864 t | 37,222 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 924.69 t | 33,553 t | 32,628 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Afghanistan or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 2,220 t against 2,188 t in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Afghanistan and Estonia?
- 32 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Estonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Afghanistan and Estonia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Afghanistan ranks 77th and Estonia ranks 76th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf