Afghanistan vs Tunisia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Afghanistan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 2,188 t against 2,012 t in Tunisia, a difference of 176 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tunisia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 72nd and Tunisia ranks 75th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 227.33 t | 261.51 t | 34.17 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 642.46 t | 728.84 t | 86.38 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 924.69 t | 744 t | 180.69 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Afghanistan or Tunisia?
- Afghanistan, at 2,188 t against 2,012 t in Tunisia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Afghanistan and Tunisia?
- 176 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Tunisia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Afghanistan and Tunisia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Afghanistan ranks 72nd and Tunisia ranks 75th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf