Argentina vs Colombia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Argentina
- Colombia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 768,343 t against 184,001 t in Colombia, a difference of 584,342 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 4.2 times Colombia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 5th and Colombia ranks 7th of 165 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 386,564 t | 114,700 t | 271,863 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 656,639 t | 151,869 t | 504,770 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 808,991 t | 160,630 t | 648,361 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Argentina or Colombia?
- Argentina, at 768,343 t against 184,001 t in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Argentina and Colombia?
- 584,342 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Colombia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Colombia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Argentina ranks 5th and Colombia ranks 7th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf