Australia vs Brazil: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Australia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 4.21 million t against 1.48 million t in Australia, a difference of 2.73 million t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.8 times Australia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 4th and Brazil ranks 1st of 165 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 575,496 t | 1.33 million t | 756,776 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 788,323 t | 2.64 million t | 1.85 million t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 1.16 million t | 4.67 million t | 3.51 million t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Australia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 4.21 million t against 1.48 million t in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Australia and Brazil?
- 2.73 million t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Australia ranks 4th and Brazil ranks 1st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf