Australia vs Canada: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 1.78 million t against 1.48 million t in Australia, a difference of 297,280 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 4th and Canada ranks 2nd of 165 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 575,496 t | 672,116 t | 96,621 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 788,323 t | 912,718 t | 124,395 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 1.16 million t | 1.61 million t | 453,191 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Australia or Canada?
- Canada, at 1.78 million t against 1.48 million t in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Australia and Canada?
- 297,280 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Australia ranks 4th and Canada ranks 2nd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf