Azerbaijan vs Latvia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Azerbaijan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36,357 t against 29,852 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 6,505 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 777.78 t | 6,671 t | 5,893 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 28,542 t | 15,143 t | 13,398 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 39,131 t | 23,832 t | 15,299 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Azerbaijan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 36,357 t against 29,852 t in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Azerbaijan and Latvia?
- 6,505 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Latvia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Latvia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Azerbaijan ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf