Belarus vs Guyana: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Belarus
- Guyana
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 10.24 t against 5.53 t in Guyana, a difference of 4.71 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.9 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 134th and Guyana ranks 136th of 165 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30,417 t | 12.17 t | 30,405 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 108,666 t | 84.3 t | 108,582 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 24,102 t | 194.26 t | 23,907 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Belarus or Guyana?
- Belarus, at 10.24 t against 5.53 t in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Belarus and Guyana?
- 4.71 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guyana?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Guyana rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Belarus ranks 134th and Guyana ranks 136th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf