Belarus vs Iceland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Belarus
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 15.46 t against 10.24 t in Belarus, a difference of 5.22 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 120th of 154 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49,371 t | 1,950 t | 47,421 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 107,645 t | 48.05 t | 107,597 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 54,204 t | 97.19 t | 54,107 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Belarus or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 15.46 t against 10.24 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Belarus and Iceland?
- 5.22 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Belarus ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 120th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf