Bhutan vs Luxembourg: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Bhutan
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.03 t against 0.01 t in Bhutan, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 3.0 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Bhutan ranks 158th and Luxembourg ranks 155th of 165 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0075 t | 2.88 t | 2.87 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.005 t | 0.005 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.015 t | 0.025 t | 0.01 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Bhutan or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.03 t against 0.01 t in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 0.02 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Luxembourg?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Luxembourg rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Bhutan ranks 158th and Luxembourg ranks 155th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf