Burkina Faso vs Guinea: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Guinea
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 5.01 t against 4.03 t in Guinea, a difference of 0.98 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guinea ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 127th and Guinea ranks 129th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.25 t | 10 t | 9.75 t | Guinea |
| 2010s | 93.72 t | 2.49 t | 91.23 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 5.01 t | 4.03 t | 0.98 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Guinea?
- Burkina Faso, at 5.01 t against 4.03 t in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Guinea?
- 0.98 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Guinea rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 127th and Guinea ranks 129th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf