Burkina Faso vs Guyana: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 5.53 t against 5.01 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.52 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Guyana ranks 136th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.94 t | 12.17 t | 81.77 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 187.63 t | 85.69 t | 101.94 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 5.01 t | 5.53 t | 0.52 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 5.53 t against 5.01 t in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Guyana?
- 0.52 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guyana?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Guyana rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 138th and Guyana ranks 136th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf