Colombia vs Paraguay: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Colombia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 241,898 t against 184,001 t in Colombia, a difference of 57,897 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.3 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 7th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 117,236 t | 1,326 t | 115,911 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 151,869 t | 87,441 t | 64,428 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 160,630 t | 228,760 t | 68,130 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Colombia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 241,898 t against 184,001 t in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Colombia and Paraguay?
- 57,897 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Paraguay?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Paraguay rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Colombia ranks 7th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf