Costa Rica vs Ireland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 4,463 t against 4,137 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 326 t.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 66th and Ireland ranks 64th of 165 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,564 t | 8,053 t | 510.73 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 3,387 t | 167.41 t | 3,220 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 4,313 t | 962.23 t | 3,351 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Costa Rica or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 4,463 t against 4,137 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 326 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Ireland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 66th and Ireland ranks 64th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf