Czechia vs Lithuania: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Czechia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 39,048 t against 36,454 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,594 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 32nd and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61,246 t | 13,389 t | 47,858 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 39,556 t | 22,965 t | 16,591 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 30,383 t | 32,560 t | 2,177 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Czechia or Lithuania?
- Czechia, at 39,048 t against 36,454 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Czechia and Lithuania?
- 2,594 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Czechia ranks 32nd and Lithuania ranks 33rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf