Denmark vs Mauritius: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Denmark
- Mauritius
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 651.34 t against 442.52 t in Mauritius, a difference of 208.82 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mauritius ahead.
Denmark ranks 95th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,217 t | 7,908 t | 4,691 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1,946 t | 550.02 t | 1,396 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 1,621 t | 718.84 t | 902.24 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Denmark or Mauritius?
- Denmark, at 651.34 t against 442.52 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Denmark and Mauritius?
- 208.82 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Mauritius?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Mauritius rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Denmark ranks 95th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf