Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Egypt
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 8,976 t against 8,472 t in Egypt, a difference of 504 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 59th and Kazakhstan ranks 58th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,993 t | 1,038 t | 954.6 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 8,478 t | 1,405 t | 7,073 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 15,149 t | 18,216 t | 3,067 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Egypt or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 8,976 t against 8,472 t in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 504 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Kazakhstan rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Egypt ranks 59th and Kazakhstan ranks 58th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf