Eswatini vs Madagascar: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 379 t against 374.5 t in Eswatini, a difference of 4.5 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 104th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 263.29 t | 64.32 t | 198.97 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 39.81 t | 44.77 t | 4.96 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 323.39 t | 286.2 t | 37.19 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Eswatini or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 379 t against 374.5 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Eswatini and Madagascar?
- 4.5 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Madagascar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Madagascar rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 104th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf