Ethiopia vs Madagascar: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 411.45 t against 379 t in Madagascar, a difference of 32.45 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 165 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 170,481 t | 64.32 t | 170,417 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 28,912 t | 87.32 t | 28,825 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 299.06 t | 286.2 t | 12.85 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Ethiopia or Madagascar?
- Ethiopia, at 411.45 t against 379 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Ethiopia and Madagascar?
- 32.45 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Madagascar rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 100th and Madagascar ranks 103rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf