Ethiopia vs Mauritius: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Ethiopia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 442.52 t against 411.45 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 31.07 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 100th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 178,713 t | 7,908 t | 170,805 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 19,550 t | 550.02 t | 19,000 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 299.06 t | 787.91 t | 488.86 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Ethiopia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 442.52 t against 411.45 t in Ethiopia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Ethiopia and Mauritius?
- 31.07 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mauritius?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Mauritius rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Ethiopia ranks 100th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf