Finland vs New Zealand: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1,177 t against 758.99 t in New Zealand, a difference of 418.01 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.6 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 165 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,430 t | 4,832 t | 597.76 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 3,994 t | 1,408 t | 2,586 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 3,607 t | 1,371 t | 2,235 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Finland or New Zealand?
- Finland, at 1,177 t against 758.99 t in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Finland and New Zealand?
- 418.01 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Finland ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf