Georgia vs Nicaragua: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Georgia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 2,623 t against 2,531 t in Georgia, a difference of 92 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 66th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 673.65 t | 508.38 t | 165.27 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1,105 t | 5,729 t | 4,625 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 4,622 t | 2,574 t | 2,048 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Georgia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 2,623 t against 2,531 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Georgia and Nicaragua?
- 92 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Nicaragua?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Nicaragua rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Georgia ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 66th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf