Georgia vs Philippines: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Georgia
- Philippines
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,531 t against 2,245 t in Philippines, a difference of 286 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Philippines ahead.
Georgia ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 70th of 154 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 673.65 t | 9,886 t | 9,212 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1,105 t | 10,840 t | 9,736 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 4,204 t | 2,925 t | 1,279 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Georgia or Philippines?
- Georgia, at 2,531 t against 2,245 t in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Georgia and Philippines?
- 286 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Philippines?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Philippines rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Georgia ranks 67th and Philippines ranks 70th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf