Guatemala vs Nicaragua: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Guatemala
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 3,599 t against 2,623 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 976 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.4 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 71st of 165 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,315 t | 869.72 t | 18,445 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 14,141 t | 5,729 t | 8,412 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 7,693 t | 2,574 t | 5,119 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Guatemala or Nicaragua?
- Guatemala, at 3,599 t against 2,623 t in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Guatemala and Nicaragua?
- 976 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nicaragua?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Nicaragua rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Guatemala ranks 68th and Nicaragua ranks 71st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf