Guinea vs Singapore: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Guinea
- Singapore
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 4.03 t against 3.23 t in Singapore, a difference of 0.8 t.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Guinea ranks 140th and Singapore ranks 142nd of 165 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 t | 25.5 t | 15.5 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 1.5 t | 84.79 t | 83.29 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 2.44 t | 27.71 t | 25.28 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Guinea or Singapore?
- Guinea, at 4.03 t against 3.23 t in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Guinea and Singapore?
- 0.8 t, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Singapore rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Guinea ranks 140th and Singapore ranks 142nd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf