Indonesia vs Slovenia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Indonesia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 65,719 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia, a difference of 7,286 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 21st of 165 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,466 t | 584.92 t | 16,881 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 21,042 t | 500.63 t | 20,542 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 52,123 t | 36,402 t | 15,721 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Indonesia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 65,719 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Indonesia and Slovenia?
- 7,286 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Slovenia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Indonesia ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 21st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf