Indonesia vs Uruguay: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Indonesia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 74,488 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia, a difference of 16,055 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.3 times Indonesia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 19th of 154 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,466 t | 73,013 t | 55,547 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 21,042 t | 101,292 t | 80,250 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 52,123 t | 85,283 t | 33,160 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Indonesia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 74,488 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Indonesia and Uruguay?
- 16,055 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Uruguay?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Uruguay rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Indonesia ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 19th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf