Indonesia vs Zimbabwe: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Indonesia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 68,411 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia, a difference of 9,978 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17,466 t | 2,836 t | 14,630 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 21,042 t | 41,542 t | 20,500 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 50,546 t | 92,155 t | 41,610 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Indonesia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 68,411 t against 58,433 t in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 9,978 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Zimbabwe rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Indonesia ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf