Kazakhstan vs Kenya: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 8,976 t against 8,402 t in Kenya, a difference of 574 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 58th and Kenya ranks 60th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,038 t | 5,229 t | 4,191 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 1,931 t | 28,224 t | 26,293 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 18,216 t | 3,615 t | 14,601 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Kazakhstan or Kenya?
- Kazakhstan, at 8,976 t against 8,402 t in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 574 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kenya rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Kazakhstan ranks 58th and Kenya ranks 60th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf