Kazakhstan vs Myanmar: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Kazakhstan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 9,992 t against 8,976 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1,016 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Myanmar ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 58th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,420 t | 194.78 t | 1,225 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 316.57 t | 943.75 t | 627.18 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 18,216 t | 2,884 t | 15,332 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Kazakhstan or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 9,992 t against 8,976 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Kazakhstan and Myanmar?
- 1,016 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Myanmar?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Myanmar rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Kazakhstan ranks 58th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf