Kenya vs Saudi Arabia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Kenya
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 8,402 t against 4,628 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 3,774 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.8 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 63rd of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61,390 t | 4,554 t | 56,836 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 28,224 t | 3,909 t | 24,315 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 3,615 t | 6,095 t | 2,480 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Kenya or Saudi Arabia?
- Kenya, at 8,402 t against 4,628 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
- 3,774 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Saudi Arabia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Kenya ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 63rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf