Lithuania vs Viet Nam: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 39,914 t against 36,454 t in Lithuania, a difference of 3,460 t.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 33rd and Viet Nam ranks 31st of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,389 t | 32,891 t | 19,502 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 22,965 t | 56,325 t | 33,360 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 31,587 t | 30,721 t | 865.7 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Lithuania or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 39,914 t against 36,454 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 3,460 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Viet Nam rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 33rd and Viet Nam ranks 31st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf