Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.03 t against 0.01 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.02 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 3.0 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 158th of 165 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.26 t | 3.37 t | 0.11 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0.04 t | 0.04 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- Luxembourg, at 0.03 t against 0.01 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 0.02 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 158th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf