Luxembourg vs Uganda: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity
Luxembourg
0.03 t
in 2024
Uganda
0.03 t
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
155th
Uganda rank
155th
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Uganda
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.03 t against 0.03 t in Uganda, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 155th of 165 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.58 t | 301.76 t | 298.19 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.005 t | 209.16 t | 209.15 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0.0267 t | 16.68 t | 16.66 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity, Luxembourg or Uganda?
- Luxembourg, at 0.03 t against 0.03 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity between Luxembourg and Uganda?
- 0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Uganda rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 155th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf